Thursday 23 December 2010

Our Twisted Road

“I'm with you
Whenever you tell, my story
For I am all I've done


Remember, I will still be here
As long as you hold me, in your memory
Remember me”

These lyrics written for the motion picture, “Troy” reverberate mans struggle for importance throughout today’s society as strongly as they did for the ancients. The story of “Troy” recounts the Greek Mythological story of Achilles. In the film he is approached by his mother, who gives him two options. She tells him that he may go and fight in the war over Helen of Troy, and if he does that then he will die, but his name will echo throughout time and never be forgotten. But if on the other hand, he chooses to stay, he will have children and live a long and happy life, but once his children’s, children are dead, his name will whither as will his body and be forgotten. Though Achilles feels no loyalty to his king or country, he chooses to fight, because the desire to not be forgotten and to be important supersedes everything else, even the preservation of his own life.

Today we have created our own modern pathway that defies logic, but leads to the same end of established importance that scorches our name into the very fabric of time. Today just as it was for the ancients, this pathway is paved with lies disguised as truth. Whilst the lies have changed and morphed over time, they remain lies nonetheless and continue to lay ruin to society.

We have replaced the honor and glory of the warrior with acquisition of reaching the highest levels of success in career, wealth and social contacts. Society in this present age tells its subjects that if a person is to matter to this world, they must reach these great heights; But requires not only reaching extraordinary levels of achievement, but to do so instantly and with as little effort as possible. Society holds those who achieve this remarkable whirlwind success as gods. A walk past the magazine rack or a stroll through a favorite bookstore is evidence enough that this is true. Faces plastered on biographies of people who figured out the formula to instant success. Self Help books and biographies that seem to omit the hard work that led to the success of those that had to earn their way to the top only further confirm what our society values.

Further more this twisted path to self worth says that everyone can obtain this instant success, that hard work is not needed, only the right formula. This idea is responsible for the misery of thousands that find themselves unable to commit to anything for more than a year as they desperately try and figure out this magical formula that will shoot them to the top; and terrified if they commit for longer that will they will waste their life trying. This value manages to even spread its wretched poison to the hardworking. It prompts them to believe that handwork means nothing unless one reaches the top. That a life is wasted and meaningless if it spends all of its years at work and still never obtains its goals. As if to suggest that the target of reaching the top is an easy one and those who can’t manage to figure out the formula to success are so thick headed they are a waste of time and space.

What is to be done then? Is human kind doomed to fall time and time again for the same lies, forced forevermore to wander blindly down the brutal and hopeless road of twisted values in hopes that we will stumble across something that will give worth to our name?

History, not only serves as a sad reflection of mans unchanging desire for greatness, but if we look, it provides extraordinary truths taught through the lives of exceptional people and movements.

One of these extraordinary lives is that of William Wilberforce. Wilberforce began his journey in 1780 as an independent member of Parliament for Yorkshire. He lived the ordinary life of a politician and while he had much success there was nothing truly remarkable about him. Then in 1785 he went through a radical transformation through a conversion experience. Out of this experience was born his deep conviction that slavery should be abolished in England. This unwavering and relentless passion drove Wilberforce forward for the next 26 years until in 1807 when the bill was finally passed.

While Wilberforce’s achievement was remarkable and changed the shape of the world, it is how he got there that is even more remarkable than the victory itself. Wilberforce’s life serves as an everlasting reminder of his undying reckless abandon of pursuing nothing else and sacrificing everything for one goal. For us it seems an easy and a noble decision to give ones life to such a moral cause. But for Wilberforce and the world he lived in it was a foolish and reckless decision. For the people of the late 1700’s slavery was not a moral decision, it was a political one. England was built on the backs of slaves and to propose that these slaves be set free, was as good as asking England to cut off her own legs, or handing the nation surrender to France who were an ever looming threat. For Wilberforce’s generation the abolition of slavery was crazy and even seen as being disloyal to the country. So for Wilberforce to decide to give as many years of his life as was necessary to this cause was an overwhelmingly daunting one. It had very little hope of success and every hope of ridicule and dishonor from his peers. It risked his social standing, his job, and reputation. But this mattered not for Wilberforce, not even his ill health could stop him from what he knew in his heart to be right.

Wilberforce was not after fame, he was not after that formula that would burn his name into the fabric of time. He was after a better world. He was after doing what he knew to be right. Because he was not in it for himself, failure did not matter. He knew that even if he did not succeed, that before God he would have spent his life trying. When he finally did obtain his goal he did not do so by dreaming, by finding an easy solution or reading a self help book. He did so through back breaking and health crippling work. Wilberforce lived and breathed for the freedom for slaves. We too need to understand this truth and practice it. Hard work is a must if we are to ever to make a difference in this earth. Self sacrifice and devotion to others must be our creed if we are to ever find true satisfaction with our life’s work. For our end goal should not be to be remembered, it should be to make a difference for future generations even if they never know our name.


The next truth to be gleaned from history comes through the lives of 3 men, Humphrey Davy, Joseph Wilson Swan, and Charles Francis Brush. For most of us these names mean very little or nothing at all, but the lesson they have to teach are invaluable. In 1800 Humphrey Davy created the first electric battery that in turn created the first electric arc, the worlds first source of electric light. In 1860 Joseph Wilson Swan set out with the goal to make a long lasting electric light. He discovered that paper filaments produced longer lasting light but was unstable as the filaments burned out too quickly. In 1877 Charles Francis Brush created a carbon arch that allowed him to use electric light to illuminate a few town squares and stores, but still made it impractical for general consumption. Then in 1879 Thomas Edison created his incandescent light bulb that burned for 40 hours and brought electric light to the general public. We do not hear the stories of the men that came before Edison often, but without their discoveries the light would not have progressed to the place for Edison to make his great discovery and change the way human kind lives.

In a society that preaches so loudly that if you are not the one to win the prize in your lifetime then your efforts were a waste of time, it is vital that we see that this principle is as far from the truth as possible. Many of us are called to work hard to give our lives for a cause we will never see completed. But this doesn’t make us failures; this makes us a vital part of a team that spans generations. If we do not do our part then when it comes time for the Edison’s of tomorrow to do their part, the groundwork will not be laid and change will not come. It is so important to understand that we, just like the men who came before Edison are of no lesser value, we are equal to those who finally accomplish the goal for without us they would have never achieved all that history has and will remember them for. This world is much bigger than any one of us. Our actions will reverberate throughout time hurting or helping generations to come, just as previous generations have shaped the world to make it what it is today.

If we so choose to, we do not have to be doomed to follow down the same pathway that led Achilles to his death and the depression of so many today. If we choose to, we can look at the lessons that history has to teach. We may choose to create a new road, a road that few will tread, but with enough time, enough work and enough self sacrifice maybe, someday, ours will be the road that future generations choose to walk. We need not fear that we are unimportant or that we will be forgotten. Every action leads to a reaction and we have only to choose if our actions will lead to positive change for the future. Our actions, do not define us, they reflect us.


“Genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration.” -Thomas A. Edison


 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:

Saturday 23 October 2010

We Will Be Right Back After The Break!

You have had a long day at work and you are really looking forward to coming home, kicking off your shoes, having a nice hot dinner and relaxing to you favorite TV programs. You snuggle under a warm blanket and turn on your favorite program but instead of relaxing, frustration begins to rise as your program is interrupted every 5 minutes by 10 minutes of commercials. The only reprieve from the onslaught of commercials are the few that provide a smile and true entertainment.

While these well-produced commercials seem few in number compared to the mass of painful ones that we fumble with our remote to mute, they do exist. These good commercials have the opposite effect, they make us laugh and turn the sound back on and we feel somehow it was worth the departure from our show to view them.

Upon pondering over what some my favorite commercials were, I came to the realization that in my opinion, many of the best commercials are chocolate commercials. I think my favorite of these Chocolate ads have to be the ever amusing M&M ads. These tasty snacks barely need advertising but in true M&M form their commercials are as delicious as their snacks. Always skating on the edge of dark comedy their most recent commercial might just be their best yet.


Recently Cadbury’s Chocolate released a new Chocolate bar called, “ Cadbury’s Spots vs. Stripes” a delicious milk chocolate frame with smooth white chocolate squares in the center. This bar is more than a delicious treat and is part of a UK wide competition. By going online ordinary people can pick a side, spots or stripes and then through the website can win points for their team. The commercial is visually stunning and comically presented and will be sure to leave you chuckling.


The next chocolate themed commercial that makes my list of well done commercials is one for Milka. For those of you unfamiliar with the brand, it is an Austrian chocolate and if you can get you hands on some you are certainly in for a treat. This commercial is cute, funny and very creative.


Making number three on the list is Cadbury’s once again but this time advertising their Cream eggs. These commercials are twisted, immature, and darkly themed but every so funny. They will be sure to make you follow a laugh with a shake of your head and leave you saying “That was so wrong!”


While Hershey takes the last spot on my list of well produced chocolate commercials, it is just as sweet as the first. Hershey has been running sweet and endearing commercials for their chocolate kisses every Christmas for as long as I can remember. And in my opinion, another good reason to get excited for Christmas.


Following in the footsteps of chocolate there are quite a few clever food adverts. One of my favorites is the new series advertising Birds Eye frozen foods. The commercial features a polar bear with an attitude. Despite his somewhat icy outer shell you will be sure to fall in love with this freezer bear.


Classic, delicious and refreshing Coca cola has been releasing us classic commercials as long as they have been making their classic beverage. While there are countless ads to pick from, their “beautifully coca cola” ad is fantastically animated, endearing and never gets old.


If cheese was not a delightful enough treat in itself, Boursain has found a way to make their cheese just as delectable for a good laugh as it is to eat. Boursain, a French cheese cleverly pokes fun at other wine and cheese commercials that try and lure in consumers with seductive marketing.


Leaving food behind, Superdrug (much like CVS, for American readers) provides a commercial that plays on the fear of couples waking up in the same bed for the first time. Cheeky, sweet and silly this ad will certainly make you smile and awake your own memories of waking up for the first time with your partner.


The last commercial that makes my best commercial list is one for Warner Leisure Hotels. Departing from their normally more serious themes, Warner takes a more lighthearted approach and produces a very simplistic and yet very effective commercial.


I hope that the next time your favorite show is interrupted by a long string of commercials, instead of feeling frustration you might feel curiosity. And instead of pressing mute you might just give the ad a chance, you never know, it might actually be worth watching.

“Historians and archaeologists will one day discover that the ads of our time arethe richest and most faithful reflections that any society ever made of its entire range of activities.”

-Marshall McLuhan

 


Sources:-----------------------------------------------------
Youtube.com
http://www.brainyquote.com

Friday 15 October 2010

A Historical Hunt For Camelot and it's King Arthur

Many of us have grown up with the grand stories of King Arthur and his Round Table in the fair and majestic Camelot. We have marveled at the fantastic tales of the wizard Merlin and felt torn over the love story of Lancelot and Guinevere. These stories that we write off as nothing more then fairytales may in fact be something more.

Because Camelot and King Arthur are at the center of all these tales, they will be our focus. As I dove into research for the origins of Camelot and Arthur, seeking to find if they had any real historical merit, I found the answer to be full of riddles and not nearly as simplistic as I thought it would be.Before I can begin to untangle the historical relevance or even accuracy, we must first set straight the more fantastical literary stories.

The first place that Arthur is mentioned is around 1100 AD in the Welsh story of “Culhwch and Olwen”. This story with its Welsh origins would not have been a known story outside of the Welsh community. Despite its selective audience it is very important as it reveals the first assigned location of Arthur’s residence. Arthur is by no means the hero of this tale, and is only assigned but a few lines. But those sentences tell us that Arthur is residing in Celliwig; the welsh name for Cornwall. It is important to remember here that Cornwall was a kingdom in its self at this time in history and spanned the whole lower half of modern day England. The story does not give us further information as to where in Cornwall or what Arthur’s Kingdom was called. 

The second and most notable source for Arthurian legend comes only 35 years later in the year 1135 by British writer, Geoffrey of Monmouth. His book, “The History of the Kings of Britain” Or otherwise known "Historia Regum Britanniate". This book spans a remarkable two thousand years starting with Brute of Troy who settled in Britain becoming known as the first king of Britain, and ending with the Anglo Saxon’s claiming the British throne in the 7th century.

It is in the height of this text that we find the story of Arthur. Once the Romans leave Britain, a man by the name of Vortigern comes to power but two Saxon mercenaries betray him who were under his employ. This thrusts the British kingdom into a state of war under the new power of brothers, Aurelius Ambrosius and Uther Pendragon. Uther of course is the father of Arthur and with the help of the Wizard Merlin, Arthur grows to become a great man and military leader. It is accounted in the book that Arthur beats the Saxons so severely they no longer remain a threat. Arthur goes on, in the text, to win most of Western Europe ushering in a time of great peace and prosperity. This lasts until the newly appointed Roman Emperor Luscious Tiberius demands that Britain once again pays tribute to Rome. Being the great king that Arthur now is, he rides to Gaul and defeats Luscious. But in his absence his nephew Mordred takes his throne. Arthur rides back to his kingdom and defeats Mordred, but is mortally wounded. His body is carried to the Isle of Avalon where he hands over his throne to his cousin Constantine and then dies. Interestingly enough there is no mention of a round table or Camelot in Geoffrey’s work. He places Arthur’s kingdom in the “City of Legions” or more commonly known as Caerleon, the welsh meaning for, City or Fort of Legions. Geoffrey’s describes it like this,

“For it was located in a delightful spot in Glamorgan, on the River Usk, not far from the Severn Sea. Abounding in wealth more than other cities, it was suited for such a ceremony. For the noble river I have named flows along it on one side, upon which the kings and princes who would be coming from overseas could be carried by ship. But on the other side, protected by meadow and woods, it was remarkable for royal palaces, so that it imitated Rome in the golden roofs of its buildings ...Famous for so may pleasant features, Caerleon was made ready for the announced feast.”

With only 35 years between the first account of Arthur and Geoffrey’s account, we have two very different places where Arthur supposedly held his kingdom. If these were the only two texts that existed we would be hopelessly at odds to where Camelot would have been or if it even existed. But thankfully in 1170 to 1185 French writer Chrétien De Troyes provides us with a literary work that unites the two.  When writing “Lancelot” or “The Knight of the Cart” Troyes opens his story thusly,

“Upon a certain Ascension Day King Arthur had come from Caerleon, and had held a very magnificent court at Camelot as was fitting on such a day.”

While the actual story has very little to do with Arthur himself, the opening of the tale is the first place we see Camelot mentioned, and further more find its connection to Geoffrey’s Caerleon. Troyes suggests that Arthur has two main places of residence; one is Caerleon and another in Camelot. But where is Camelot and what about the Welsh stories placing him in Cornwall? Well Troyes addresses these questions as well. At the end of his story he says,

“…it is decided that the battle shall be fought at the court of King Arthur, who holds Britain and Cornwall in his sway…”

This last line suggests that Camelot is in Cornwall or Britain, Cornwall being the more likely place as it matches the location in “Culhwch and Olwen”. This also lines up with Geoffrey’s idea that Arthur conquered most of Western Europe. This of course including parts of Cornwall.

So between these three literary works we now know that Arthur was indeed the King of Britain, that he had two main places of residence, Camelot most likely in Cornwall and Caerleon in Wales. We know he was influential in driving out the Saxons and gaining much of Western Europe for Britain, and lastly we know that he died on the Isle of Avalon.

So with this information in mind we plunge forward to see if the man and the places he lived really existed.  Information is only as reliable as its sources and so it is important we look at the validly of these texts as historical documents.

Sadly none of the texts have very much weight to suggest they have any real historical claim. “Culhwch and Olwen” is a Welsh story and holds no more historical value than “Jack and the Beanstalk”.

Geoffrey’s “The History of the Kings of Britain” has even more unstable origins. History tells us that Geoffrey of Monmouth decided it was important that a book be written detailing Britain’s rise to power and its great hold on the surrounding areas. With this mission in mind he began to pen “The History of the Kings of Britain”. The only problem was that dear Geoffrey was having a rather hard time finding any source materials. When everything looked like the project would not be completed, Geoffrey miraculously ran into his old friend Archdeacon Walter or otherwise know as Walter of Oxford. Walter provided Geoffrey with in his own words,“ A very ancient book” that he was able to translate and put directly into his own manuscript. In addition to the sketchy sources for Geoffrey’s work there was a lot of political benefits to writing such a manuscript, whether accurate or false. With Britain forever in war over ownership of lands and British Kings always looking for ways to legitimize their right to the throne, “The History of the Kings of Britain” provided kings with the proof of their legitimacy they so longed for. Despite its shaky background, the kings of England regarded it as an accurate history for centuries after Geoffrey’s death.

Similarly Troyes, “Lancelot” has no historical claim either. Troyes was the recipient to the patronage of the Countess Marie de Champagne who was the daughter of Eleanor of Aquitaine who was married to King Henry II of England. At the Countess’ request Troyes writes his fictional work, “Lancelot”.

While these works hold no historical value in their literal translation, it is still vary plausible that they were inspired by real places and events. It is commonly believed by many historians that Geoffrey drew heavily on his modern history and European folklore to construct his “History of the Kings of Britain”. They note the remarkable similarity of King Arthur’s battles with the Saxons to the historically accurate accounts. And likewise find parallels with modern folklore of the time to the more fanciful parts of his work. In fact there is historical record naming a King Arthur at the Anglo Saxon battle at Badon Hill. Making it very likely that while not as famous or great as Geoffrey’s King Arthur, a King Arthur existed and may have very well been the inspiration for Geoffrey’s work.

Troyes similarly, I believe, found his inspiration for his story in actual people and places. Troyes, remember, was contemporaries with Geoffrey writing, writing his own work, “Lancelot” only 40 or 50 years later. For him Geoffrey’s work would have been revered as historical fact. So when Troyes is approached by the daughter of the King of England to construct a story, it seems very logical for him to refer to Geoffrey’s work. After all, as previously stated “The History of the Kings of Britain” was seen as proof of the British Kings right to their thrones. By writing a story around a book with such a powerful reputation he would be confirming the rightfulness of King Henry to his throne. Even though the story was meant for the Kings daughter, Troyes main goal would have been to pander to the King. Troyes is very skilled when constructing his story. He starts out with King Arthur, harkening back to Geoffrey and then quickly steers away and dives into a fanciful tale, bring the whole thing full circle at the stories end by mentioning King Arthur once again. Beginning and ending with the idea that the king comes from a long line of noble men who rightfully claim power to their thrones.

But why mention Cornwall or Caerleon? Why not just keep the story in Camelot? Once aging, Troyes was writing a fictional piece unlike Geoffrey. So he would have wanted the story to be magical rather then factual. But since he was also using his story to grant him favor with the king, he had to keep his fantasy within the parameters of Arthurian legend. By mentioning Caerleon he was once again drawing on Geoffrey’s work, but he most certainly would not have wanted to mess with what he believed to be history. So he moves Arthur from Caerleon to Camelot most likely in Cornwall; Troyes too drawing on his environment. After Geoffrey’s work was published, “Culhwch and Olwen” would have become widely known because of its connection with Arthur, and with it, the idea that Arthur owned a castle in Cornwall. If it is true that Troyes used his literary contemporaries and modern history as his inspiration, then it is logical that Troyes would have picked up on Cornwall. But if this is the case and is the location of his magical Camelot then why did he feel the need to say,
  
“at the court of King Arthur, who holds Britain and Cornwall in his sway”

Even more puzzling is why Troyes felt the need to name his kingdom in the first place. Both the kingdoms mentioned in “Culhwch and Olwen” as well as by Geoffrey do not list a name for the kingdom just a location. So why would Troyes name his, why not just say,

“Upon a certain Ascension Day King Arthur had come from Caerleon, and had held a very magnificent court at his kingdom..” in Cornwall or Briton?

Troyes could have been saying that Camelot was in either Britain or Cornwall, but what I think it is more likely is that he  mentions Cornwall because that is the location of Camelot and mentions Britain because that is the origins of the rule of King Henry II. So in other words Britain is thrown in, not because it is important to the story, but as an added ego boost for the king. Furthermore, naming the kingdom Camelot would have brought the fanciful twist to a story based in what Troyes believed to be history. Cornwall exists, Britain exists, and Caerleon exists. So Troyes needed a place that did not exist by that name, a place where his characters could do whatever they please without insulting history. But just because the name Camelot does not exist does not mean there is not evidence supporting that Troyes used modern geography and locations to inspire him.

There are many places that claim to be the origins of Camelot. But after reading through many of them, there are only two that really catch my attention. 

Under the pretence that my assumptions are wrong about why Troyes mentions Britain, there is a site in Winchester that is located in the kingdom of Britain, where a giant round table was discovered by Sir Malory. He suggests in his “Le Morte D’ Arthur, printed in 1485, that this is the legendary round table of King Arthur’s fame and therefore must be the location of Camelot. The problem with this claim is that it rides wholly on the origins of the round table. As I mentioned earlier Geoffrey makes no mention of the round table. It is in fact introduced into the legend of Camelot in Wace’s “Roman de Brut” a Norman translation of Geoffrey’s work. His translation was finished in 1155, just 20 years after the original. While it is possible that Wace drew on the table at Winchester as his inspiration, it is far more likely that he drew his inspiration from the books setting in Caerleon.
 Consistent with Geoffrey’s description of Caerleon there are many Roman ruins thought the city. One of these is a round hole that appears to have benches placed around its outer rim and a round table or raised floor at its center. It is thought that this is where Wace drew his inspiration, and that the original translation, round meeting place was skewed over the years becoming round table. The table at Winchester from my viewpoint was probably constructed to mimic the round table in Wace’s translation, in order to make the king of that castle appear just, righteous and fair as King Arthur was. This information only strengthens the idea that Britain was only mentioned by Troyes for the Kings benefit and that the true location for Camelot’s inspiration is indeed in Cornwall.

Camelot is derived from the Latin word, Cameldunum. In Cornwall flows the Camel river. It is very possible that Troyes used this river as his inspiration for his name. Furthermore just 12 miles from that river is the Castle Tintagel, this being the only castle that has overwhelming evidence to support the idea it was the site Troyes used for his Camelot. 

The site was originally dismissed as having any connections with King Arthur as it only had only the remains of a single monastery dating back to the 12th century. But historians and archeologists were put in awe when fires swept through the area revealing that there were the remains to not just a single monastery on the site, but over 200 buildings dating back to the late 5th century. In addition pottery was discovered from the Byzantine Empire, confirming that Tintagel was an important place of trading and wealth. But most remarkable of all was a medieval inscription found describing a king that lived there who had remarkable similarities to the legendary King Arthur. If Geoffrey really based his story on a real man and Troyes followed suit, it is very plausible that Tintagel was the home of the King Arthur mentioned in the Anglo Saxon battle at Badon Hill. In addition Tintagel is positioned between the Celtic sea and land. The Celtic sea would provide a direct route to Caerleon and provide them with the rich trade that Camelot was famous for. It would have also provided a strategic place to be for war. If they were blocked by sea they could make their way to Caerleon by land or receive reinforcements quickly and easily. I think of all the castles that exist that this one provides Troyes most closely with all the inspiration need for his literary work.

The story of Camelot, its knights, kings, lords and ladies has certainly evolved over the years into a fairytale only loosely connected with its origin. And even going back to the original tales it is most certain that King Arthur and his kingdom of Camelot do not exist as they do in the pages of Geoffrey and  Troyes  literary work. But they were most certainly inspired by real people, events and places. I think it is safe to say that there was a King Arthur, that Camelot lives on in Tintagel and that the round meeting place still stands reminding us of the lessons of great leadership.  


“On either side the river lie Long fields of barley and of rye, That clothe the world and meet the sky; And through the field the road runs by To many-towered Camelot.” 

-Tennyson
 'The Lady of Shalott' (revised1842), pt.1, l.1^5.


Sources:



















Wednesday 6 October 2010

The 3D Nightmare

The lights lower and the buzz of excited voices grow still and quiet. The smell of salt and butter fill the room, and the sounds of plastic wrappers crinkle as people dig into their tasty snacks echo in the silence. Then the large screen begins to throw colored light around the room, illuminating the expressions of the faces in the crowd. A deep voice swells from the speakers, “This winter witness a story never before told….” Tingles go through the crowd as they lean in to one another and exclaim how they don’t want to miss the up and coming film. Then the impressive preview ends with a thud as the voice over finishes, “this remarkable journey will sweep you off your feet in incredible 3D.”  The crowd groans, “just what we need, another 3D movie!” The crowd sits and endures the next 4 of 6 previews that have this same effect.

It seems the once exciting and special treat of 3D has become the thorn in the flesh in the movie goer’s side in the year 2010. Many of us might be able to look past the high boost in 3D ticket charges if the 3D experience was truly 3D; and actually made us feel the experience was worthy of our money. But sadly most of these “3D” films turn out to be nothing more then 2D films slightly raised off the screen with the occasional gag of a cup or ball hurling into the crowd. This resulting in nothing more than burn holes in your pockets, sore eyes and a headache.

The problem with most modern 3D films is that they are not filmed with a 3D camera and are instead filmed with a regular cinema camera and then made into 3D after the fact. This allows producers to show their films on both a 3D and 2D platform gaining a larger audience and the extra money from the 3D fees. Not filming with a 3D camera also rakes in the cash for producers as it saves them the money of avoiding filming with the expensive equipment.

After box office hits like Avatar 3D we have seen an explosion of 3D at the cinema. All the movie companies vying for their piece of the 3D treasure pot. And from a logical point of view who can blame them? 3D = large crowds and lots of money. But the producers have taken the 3D phenomenon a step to far. Their need to create Box Office hits and justify higher ticket prices has gotten to the point of desperation.

A 3D camera films several different images from different perspectives and by compiling them, the movie goer experiences the film as if they were actually standing in the scene of the movie with the characters. But what defines 3D as true 3D? Well to put it simply there are three axis to dimension, hence the name 3D. “X” is all the depth behind a subject, “Z” all the depth in front of a subject and “Y” is all the depth or vision from either side of the subject. (So looking at the diagram below, if “O” is the character in a movie, “Y” would be everything from the right and left of him or her, “X” would be everything behind him or her and “Z” would be everything in front.)  In essence it is creating a simulated perspective of real life. It is because of this that when a subject throws a punch, or an object comes hurling out at the audience, the fist or the object has moved in front of the subject (into the “Z” axis) and therefore interacts with the audience as would be the case in real life. This is what makes 3D so magical. The crowd becomes immersed in the film and can experience the depth of mountains far away or can feel the danger of arrows hurling through the sky straight at them.


Sadly modern 3D is not as effective. The mass majority of films now being shown in cinemas are filmed with regular 2D, or cinema cameras. These cameras only capture the “X” and “Y” axis of a picture. There is a sense of distance for far away objects, and the normal 3D depth of human beings and every day objects. But the difference is best explained in an analogy. 2D is like looking at a photograph. Proper 3D is like being where that photograph was taken. The mountains have not moved any further away, and the arrows are not any closer that they were in the picture; but once you add the “Z” axis then you are in the middle of the scene. This allows you to feel the proper proportions and realize how far things are away or how close they are; making objects seem closer or father away than they would seem in 2D. Phony 3D, uses 2D footage and brings it into the studio and then attempts to separate the “X” axis from the Y” axis and then layer them in normal 3D fashion therefore attempting to create a “Z” axis that does not really exist in their footage. This of course results in that eye straining effect where the image seems to be slightly raised off the screen. Producers know this won’t satisfy, so they digitally add proper 3D effects for that occasional gag of the cup or ball flinging into the crowd.

But why stop here? While Producers are certainly not shy to turn any 2D movie they make into 3D, know that this will not satisfy some moviegoers. In an attempt to rake in the cash and appease everyone, moviemakers produce another kind of 3D film, more authentic, but sadly short cuts are taken here too. Like I said earlier, 3D filming is very, very expensive. So many of the exclusively 3D films being shown are filmed partly with 3D cameras and partly with 2D cameras with the effects laid over them as mentioned above for 2D filming. The effect is much more crowd-pleasing and produces a cost effective result. While I am not a fan of this tactic, it is far better than the former option of filming a movie in its entirety in 2D to create a 3D movie.

But this absurd trend does not stop with Movie companies; the home entertainment market is now vying for their slice of the 3D pie. These 3D TV’s cost anywhere from £2,300 to over £4,000 just for the TV. The 3D glasses have to be charged for several hours after use and cost a whopping £99.99. All of this so that you can watch the one or two expensive channels provided that are more than likely just regular 2D TV reproduced to look like 3D.

Some might argue that 3D TV is not a marketing ploy to take advantage of those swept up in the 3D fad, but the next step in the development of high definition. I say that 3D could very well be the next step, but as long as film and Commercial TV companies continue to wrap the same old present (2D) with a new bow (3D) it will remain nothing but a gag to increase entertainment profits.

The entertainment business needs to decide what bandwagon they want to get on. If they want to be a part of technology advancement then they need to go for it and produce real 3D films and TV programs for the consumer. If they could care less about technology and innovation then they need to stop trying to stuff this phony 3D garbage down our throats. The cinema is supposed to be a place where you escape commercial TV and embark on an experience that only a cinema can provide. Sadly these fake 3D films are just another item on the long list of things that cinema is doing to kill the whole affair.

Theaters will ride this ludicrous faze out until there is nothing left. But for the moviegoer, who does not want to have a headache or feel the disappointment of a badly attempted 3D film, there are clues to help prevent this. The biggest thing is to look around and see if the film you want to see is available anywhere in 2D. If a film is available in 2D then this is your first red flag. The next thing to do is to look it up online. More than likely there will be information telling viewers if a film was filmed partly in 3D or not at all. Then lastly, it is really up to you if you want to take the chance that the money you are spending is worth the experience.

I for one will be happy when the day comes that I can sit down in the theater and watch the trailers and not see the initials 3D flash across the screen once.

"My belief is that no movie, nothing in life, leaves people neutral. You either leave them up or you leave them down."
-David Puttnam-
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
http://www.famous-quotes.com
http://i.telegraph.co.uk


Tuesday 28 September 2010

The Amusing World of Airports

 
My Husband and I just booked flights this week to head back to the USA to visit my family for Thanksgiving. In the process of booking our flights we considered how we wanted to travel, what airline to go with so on and so forth. It is easy to quickly get bogged down with all the laborious details and while getting to the destination is exciting, the thought of being jam packed in metal tube for “x” amount of hours or having excruciating layover times is never a relished thought. In fact, travel has over the years been bogged down with so many negative stereotypes that if you stop to think about them all you just might change your mind all together about your trip.

Despite mixed up flights, lost baggage, turbulence, bumpy landings and expensive airport food there is a silver lining. All over the world strange and fascinating attractions have been added to airports to try and make the travelers experience much more pleasant.

On the ground level of Amsterdam Airport Schipol, a free museum, Rijksmuseum, can be found. Here travelers can kill a few hours by wandering around and admiring the works of Jan Steen, Jacob van Ruisdael, and other Dutch painters. Here you may find many other items that are on loan to the museum from all around Amsterdam. Annexed to the museum visitors will find a small shop where they can buy specialty gifts crafted in relation to the museum. 

If history and art is not your thing then maybe you will be more attracted to the aquarium at Vancouver International airport. The aquarium is located on levels 3 and 4 and boasts a variety of brilliantly colored sea life. Amongst the variety of displays the aquarium exhibits a 30,000 gallon tank with over 850 different marine plants and animals. 


If museums and aquariums are not high tech enough to keep you entertained, then you might want to visit Hong Kong International Airport. Here if travelers wander over to level 6 of the Terminal 2 they can buy themselves a ticket to a 4D cinematic experience. The theater is equipped with 360 seats and the largest 4D screen in Asia. The room is prepared with wind, fog, water spray, and bubbles and other scenery attractions to make your experience as life like as possible. And in case you were worried, you wont find any cheesy just for 4D films here either; the Theater shows Hollywood blockbusters such as the Transformers movies.
  

All over the world strange and interesting attractions can be found. Some may enjoy the Playstation 3 console stations found in Charles de Gaulle International Airport Terminals 1 and 2 in Paris; and some may enjoy the less attractive but practical airport dentistry at Siao Paulo-Guarulhos International Airport Terminal 2, HC Clinica Odontológica. If you are not fortunate enough to be stuck in airport with such attractive entertainment, then maybe you will be heading to one of the many airports with adrenaline pumping descents.


If you are vacationing in Saint Maarten located in the northern Caribbean, you may find yourself digging your fingernails into the arm rests of your seat and clenching your eyes shut as your aircraft comes into land. The airport is located very near one of the local beaches and practically lands on sunbathers below. 


An additionally thrilling landing for passengers is on the famous Antarctic ice Runway. Landings on this runway are so tricky that only certain aircraft are allowed to attempt the landings. But even with the right aircraft landing is Antarctica is like playing Russian roulette. Planes that are too heavy can break the ice and others may get caught and sink in the snow!


While not as adrenaline pumping, Gibraltar Airport provides passengers with a somewhat comedic landing. Gibraltar is a small piece of land nestled between Spain and the Mediterranean and does not have much room for a runway. The only solution, intersect the runway with a main road. Seems like a good solution to me! As passengers land, the motor traffic comes to a halt, the aircraft landing on a runway strip that crosses the road and then taxiing over to the airport terminal.


If it is not in the entertainment or the landing, many airports have rather comical and usual names and IATA codes to make passengers smile.

Some are ridiculous…..
  • Useless Loop Airport, Australia
  •  Black Tickle Airport, Canada
  •  Beaver Creek Airport, Canada
  •  Moron Airport, Spain
  •  Ogle Airport, Guyana
  •  Eek Airport, USA
  •  Pickle Lake Airport, Canada
  •  Deadhorse Airport, USA

Some a bit daunting…
  • Mafia Airport, Tanzania
  • Slave Lake Airport, Canada
  • Asbestos Hill Airport, Canada
  • Desolation Sound Airport, Canada
  • Crooked Island Airport, Canada
  • Deception Airport, Canada
  • Battle Mountain Airport, USA
  • Rifle Airport, USA
  • Danger Bay Airport, USA

And some that you may have to look at the codes to appreciate….
  • BOG – Bogotá Airport, Columbia
  • BUM – Butler Airport, USA
  • PEE – Perm Airport, Russia
  • POO – Pocos De Caldas Airport, Brazil
  • SEX – Sembach Airport, Germany
  • FAT – Fresno Yosemite Airport, USA

Next time you find your self laid over in some strange airport, or are planning your next trip, you just don’t know, the once dreaded airport might be one of the best parts of your holiday. 


"The World is a book, and those who do not travel read only a page."
  ~St. Augustine
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
The Independent.co.uk
Travlelesure.com
Gotravle24.com



Friday 17 September 2010

A Few Facts, A Conspiracy, and a Short Lesson in History

The air is heavy, and the sky is dark, little splatters of the wet rain can be felt by the police who stand guard atop their giant steeds. The horses are restless and the clip clop of their hooves against the pavement echoes into the crisp morning air. The coo of pigeons mingles with the shouts from coordinators and security as they place blockades along the streets. The shuffle of loose gravel can be felt beneath the feet of growing crowd that waits impatiently; their buzz of excitement canceling out the dark mood of the clouds above. The news anchors arrive and roll out their cameras. They take their positions, and every one waits. The time rolls by with excruciating slowness. But finally in the distance a small procession can be seen coming toward the crowd. Some one in the crowd yells, “Look, the Pope is here.”
There has been much controversy over the arrival of Pope Benedict the 16th to the UK. Some are excited for the marking of this historical event, while are others furious that UK taxes were used to transport the religious figure. No matter what your views of the Pope, there is no doubt that there has been great scandal surrounding the religious leader. We have all watched as our TV’s flooded with stories of child abuse linked to the Catholic Church, we have heard the rumors that the Pope is linked to the Nazi Party and is anti-Semitic. But lets be honest, these stories are tired and every angle has been covered. While child abuse and the rumor of prejudice in the church is alarming what more can really be said on the matter?  Every coin has two sides and so I wish to flip the coin and approach the subject of the Pope from a less serious angle.

Conspiracy theories have flooded history from the beginning of time. And from the beginning of time the public has hung on to the every word of these theories. Today Dan Brown, the author of The Da Vinci Code and Angels and Demons, has played on the human interest of conspiracy to pen a series that is widely acclaimed and deeply controversial. Though Brown’s books are a work of fiction, they stem from real places and are loosely connected to real conspiracy theories surrounding the church. Many of these real theories are as much a work of fiction as Brown’s books, but none the less they have survived the ages and have wrapped the church in a dark shroud of obscurity and secrecy.

Pope Benedict the 16th is no exception and the internet is flooded with all kinds of theories. Weeding through some of the more crackpot conspiracies I came across one that I found truly entertaining.

The theory involves the Pope, the abstruse Knights Templar, and the black thorn in the churches side, The Illuminati. This perfect trifecta is so perfectly constructed that it is more likely to be found on the cinema screen rather than in everyday life.  Yet the theory exists. And while it is more than likely untrue it will probably be far more fascinating then anything you read about in the papers about the Pope during his visit here in the UK.

Before we dive into the theory let me provide you with a quick history lesson to catch up any who are unfamiliar with the backgrounds of players in our story.

The Knights Templar was formed during the crusades for the purpose of protecting Christendom and pilgrimages to the Holy Land. Later in the 12-century they took on more mysterious military duties. It is with their increasing wealth and great secrecy that the Templar order was soon wrapped in an enigma, spreading rumors wherever they went.  Such as their supposed involvement in hiding the shroud of Turin and the Holy Grail along with other highly esteemed Christian artifacts.  In addition rumors had begun to spread that they carried out military orders to conceal great secrets of the church. It was on Friday 13th October 1307 that the order was undone by their great secrecy. King Phillip IV of France started a hunt to torture and kill the knights.  More than likely spurred to do so by paranoia and an obsession to contain his absolute power. Eventually in 1312 they were brought to trial,where they were accused of sodomy, the worship of idols, and were blamed for the crusades failure in the Holy Land. Phillip IV then with the churches consent, officially destroyed the order. Some of the Templar were killed, others escaped into hiding, it is widely believed that some of the survivors of the Knight Templar went on to establish Free Masonry, while others kept the pure Templar movement alive underground. Many believe this group is alive and well today, and point to England as their main place of power and influence. Theorists note that the English Flag, a white background with a red cross, is the same as the Knights Templars crest. They also point to the patron Saint of England, St George who is often depicted with a white shield bearing a red cross.

The Illuminati are a bit more vague and there is much debate over their existence as the diabolical movement they are now known. This group was founded May 1, 1776 in Bavaria. These men devoted them selves to higher thinking and believed in equal rights for their fellow man. As a result many powerful politicians and wealthy nobles were attracted to the group. In addition to the power that these men lent to the organization, many members of the already influential Masons joined the ranks as well. This group led to other Illuminati groups being formed in other parts of the world. History suggests that the European sects believed that the power of kings and the church was a negative force in the world and must be done away with if true equality would ever be achieved. It is believed that these European sects grew very powerful and may have been responsible for the removal of some powerful figures in government. As a result in 1784 secret societies became illegal. This caused the organization to crumble and by 1795 then organization had “dissolved” completely.

It is at this point that history turns into conspiracy. The Illuminati have grown in infamy due to the conspiracy theories that gathered around them after their demise. It is suggested that the Illuminati still exists today and have great political control. The conspiracy says that the Illuminati have great control over the Free Masons and have great political control. It is believed that some of America’s forefathers were  members of the organization and as a result the organization still has great control in America. The pyramid and the all seeing eye on the US dollar bill is also considered proof the existence and power of the organization. But the Illuminati differed from Templars in one major way. While the Templars lived to serve and protect Christendom; the vast majority of the members of the Illuminati were atheist and believed that the church and religion should be destroyed.

So now that you have some footing on the characters, lets get back to the conspiracy at hand.

This conspiracy suggests that the Pope is directly connected with both the modern day Knights Templar and the Illuminati and with their powerful backing secured his place as the head of the Christian Catholic world; finally surrendering the church to some of the most powerful secret organizations to ever have suffered at the hands of the church.

The first sign that points to the Pope, former Cardinal Ratzinger, being linked with the Templars is in his choice of name upon accepting his office. The Pope chose the name Benedict a very poignant name from a Templar point of view as the Templar reign was based on the Rule of St. Benedict.

But the real starting point of this theory does not come from some general observation; it begins like all good modern conspiracy stories, with a cryptic anonymous phone call to a journalist.

Hertfordshire Mercury reporter Raymond Brown, who has covered the Knights Templar extensively in his writing, received an anonymous phone call urging him to investigate the new Pope based on the following 7 points:

1)    We have just seen the first conclave of the new millennium.

The start to any millennium always brings scares and worries. After all look how much the Y2K scare griped the world as we all counted down to the millennium. But other than superstitious fears, there is not real connection here with either group.

2) The new Pope knew he was going to be elected before it happened.

The support for theorists on this point comes from the following evidence:

-       Cardinal Ratzinger was the Grand Inquisitor and the Pope's chief theological policeman.

-       He presided over Pope John Paul 2nd’s funeral and over the Mass presiding the conclave that elected him Pope

-       Elected on the second day after only 4 ballots (the average length of the eight conclaves to have taken place in the 20th century took just over 3 days)

They suggest with the backing of an organization such as the templars and the Illuminati combined with the great power of his position as cardinal he could have easily acquired the votes needed before the conclave ever occurred. Furthermore with the vote only taking two days to be finalized it seems as if the decision was truly an easy one for those who voted.

3) The new Pope grew up in Bavaria, the home of the Illuminati.
This point hangs on the rumors that the Pope in his youth had a deep interested in secret societies and is said to have investigated some in his homeland. 

     4) The new pope was the Grand Inquisitor of the Holy Inquisition, which fought the Templars and the Illuminati.
This point makes a direct connection to his post as chief of the Congregation of the Doctrine for the Faith. This position and counsel previously known as the Grand Inquisitor and the Holy Inquisition. This is one of the more compelling points made by the anonymous caller. The Grand Inquisition was responsible for condemning the Templars and disbanding them all together. But surely someone in the same office handed down from century to century would hold the same values as the Grand Inquisitor of the past and truly be anti-Templar. So logic would suggest, but what if this position was gained in order to have the power not to be used against the Templars but instead to put right the wrongs of the past?  The Hertfordshire Mercury Newspaper reported in 2007 that the Pope was releasing a statement that would absolve Templar leader Jacques de Molay on the 700th anniversary of the templar persecution. Conspiracists suggest that the prior to his Papacy he was laying the groundwork for such an absolution. 

 5) In his first speech as Pope, Benedict XVI made an interesting reference to the "vineyard."
 
 The only connection with the templars and the vineyard is the fact that with their great wealth, the templars tended vineyards, farms, built castles and invested their money in all walks of life. But the vineyard is much more famously associated with the passage in the bible found in John 15:1-2,  1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman.  2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit, he taketh it away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he cleanseth it, that it may bear more fruit.” So to claim that a religious leader mentioning “the Vineyard” someway alludes to the templars is rather ludicrous 

6) The new pope has been investigating the Knights Templar and the Illuminati in Hertford.
 
7) Just before he was elected, the new Pope contacted several groups and individuals, including Dr Alan Thomson, Acting Head of History at Hertfordshire University and Alison Tinniswood, Historic Environment Record Officer of the Environment Department of Hertfordshire County Council, about the Knights Templar in Hertfordshire.
 
 In my eyes 6 and 7 are more or less the same point. Theorists point out that Hertfordshire seems to be the main hub for ancient and modern Templar activity as there are many underground tunnels that have been linked to the Templar order.

(Hertfordshire Mercury Newspaper: Friday 29th April 2005, Page 28.)
 
 The theory seems to revolve completely around this phone call. While I am sure using this as a spring board Dan Brown would have another best seller and bring the story to a mind boggling conclusion, I am afraid our story ends  with a big question mark. There is no doubt that this theory peeks interest and provides some very interesting and at times compelling points. But it also has a lot of pitfalls and inconsistencies.

 The biggest problem I see, is the Popes alleged connection to the Illuminati. Not only is the evidence weak that he has ever had any involvement, but more importantly the Illuminati wanted the very opposite of the Templars. They sought to bring down the church, meanwhile the Templars swore to protect Christendom. Now one could argue that with the betrayal of the church against the Templar order that the two groups would unite carrying out sweet revenge. But I have a hard time believing that. While the Templar order was betrayed by the Church, it did not make what they believed any different. The whole purpose of their order was to protect the church and by joining with the Illuminati they would be betraying everything they held sacred. With this in mind how could one man belong to two groups that were striving for very different things? While it is equally unlikely that the Pope is connected to the Templars, there is much more evidence for this theory.

 I leave you here to consider the interesting connections and scoff at the great potholes as you flip on your TV and undoubtedly will come across the Pope waving his blessings down to the masses below.

Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto Thy Name be the Glory.”
 
Psalm 115  (Templar Motto)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
-        abovetopsecret.com
-        Britannica.com
-        Conspericyarchive.com
-        Mystermag.com
-        About.com
-        Historymedren.com
-        Wisegeek.com
-        Timesline.co.uk
-        Hetfordshiremercury.co.uk